Washington Gay-Rights Initiative Ahead In Early Results

The Washington state ballot measure to confer additional rights to gay couples and other domestic partners has a slight lead after the first round of statewide vote counting.

As of 12:30 Wednesday morning, fifty-one percent of Washington voters have approved Referendum 71.
Forty-nine percent have rejected the measure. KUOW's John Ryan reports from Seattle.


At the Approve 71 party on Seattle's Capitol Hill, the mood was victorious despite the narrow lead.

Anne Levinson is the campaign chair. She says the early results show that voters want to preserve the domestic-partnership rights that were signed into law earlier this year.

Anne Levinson: "What this was about was whether families who need these protections would have them taken away. And the longer-term discussion about civil marriage equality is on the future horizon. "

Reporters were not allowed inside the hotel ballroom in Everett where supporters of the group Protect Marriage Washington gathered on election night. The sound of God Bless America being sung did drift through the guarded and locked doors.

Organizers said they didn't want supporters to be harassed if their names were published in the media.

The U.S. Supreme Court recently prevented the names of the signers of the R-71 petition from being disclosed by state officials. The Court is still deciding whether to make a definitive ruling in that case.

Madeleine Fleet of Marysville volunteered for the campaign to reject R-71. She spoke with me while grabbing a cigarette outside the hotel.

Madeleine Fleet: "It's worth a fight to me because I don't want our traditional marriage taken away. I don't mind that they have other rights, but I believe they do have a lot of the rights that they claim they don't have already.

John Ryan: "They being?"

Madeleine Fleet: "The gay community."

Gay-rights campaigners raised more than $2 million. They outspent their opponents four to one.

Microsoft made the biggest contribution of $100,000 to defend Washington's "everything but marriage" law.

Most campaign contributions are strictly limited to prevent corruption of elected officials. But Doug Ellis of the Public Disclosure Commission says for ballot measures, the sky's the limit.

Doug Ellis: "Ballot measures don't vote, so it's hard to corrupt a ballot measure."

Voters in most of the Puget Sound region appeared to approve R-71. The gay-rights measure was winning by nearly a two-to-one margin in King County.

But voters in Pierce County joined with every county east of the Cascades and every county south of Olympia in rejecting R-71.

State officials estimate about half of all votes have been counted so far.

Comments

November 4, 2009
11:03 a.m.
I'm sure the attitude express by Anne Levinson is the only reason this vote was even close. In every state of these United States there are millions of moderate people of faith. They don't necessarily oppose the extension of most of the rights associated with "marriage" to homosexual couples, but view "Marriage" as sacred to the Church. Absent the clear intent for R-71 to be stepping stone to the redefinition of Marriage, R-71 would have been declared a winner by last night's 10:00 news. Had the same law Maine put on the ballot been voted on in Washington, you would have seen a similar result. Frankly, I find the whole gay marriage debate to be a great case for the further separation of church and state. My solution to it would be to strike the word "marriage" from all state and federal laws and figure out something else to call it. In the process, we should rid the laws of a number of archaic rights associated with "marriage". The only reason many of these "rights" even exist is due to the undue influence of religion on government in an attempt to legislate and incentivise a moral point of view regarding monagamy.

— Posted by Dubhloaich

November 6, 2009
9:37 p.m.
being a mom of a gay man that died 16 yrs ago, and being a healthcare provider, i remember when the HIV cases 1st started, and parents did not want to have anything to do with these poor guys dying of aids, they had no one but us the medical profession to sit at their bedsides as they died....we the medical profession cried alot of tears for these patients without families or partners....no one should die alone without loved ones, be they family or partners.....and what i have found out thru all these long years, they make a whole lot of better parents than so many of the straight community...so this is only 1 small victory for R71, and they should have it....they too are citizens of these great united states, they also pay taxes as the rest of us do, and they also work as most of us do....i am elated that at last this is happening.... cool mom

— Posted by coolmom


Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post.

Login or register to set up an account.

© 2009, Oregon Public Broadcasting.

Search · Inside OPB · Report Reception Problems · Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Contact Us · Pressroom · Employment · Community · Audio Streams · RSS Feeds


PBSNPRPRIBBC