Northwest Communities Push Back Against Wind Power

A proposed wind farm near White Salmon, Washington would obstruct views of the Columbia Gorge National Scenic Area.

That’s what a National Park Service official told the Bonneville Power Administration as it reviews the proposed wind turbines.

That news comes as residents in eastern Oregon push back against wind turbines there.

Central Oregon correspondent Ethan Lindsey reports.


The Umatilla Planning Commission is debating a "No Turbine Zone" near the Blue Mountains.

Local residents want to designate the area as a "visual resource".

In the past few years, energy investors have come in force – wind now produces 3 percent of Oregon’s electricity.

But Oregon Rural Action executive director Andrea Malmberg say there’s a right way to do it, by providing jobs and tax revenues to the local community.

Andrea Malmberg: “The history of rural Oregon has been that we are very dependent on exporting our resources, whether it be timber, or beef, or now wind. We need to have a voice in what are our resources, and how are they going to benefit our communities, here."

Umatilla Planning Commissioners say they will debate the turbine ban for at least another month. If passed, it goes to county commissioners for a final decision.

Comments

July 2, 2009
4:55 p.m.
Every choice we make has consequences. Yes, if the wind farms are built, they will impact the "visual resources" of the area (whether this is a negative or positive impact is a personal decision), but more importantly, they will also provide us with clean, renewable energy and a boost for local economies. If someone chooses to oppose these projects because of their aesthetic impacts, they are also opposing the offset of 2,891 tons of carbon dioxide PER EACH 1.5 MW turbine - equivalent to taking 480 passenger cars off the road. Climate change is the recognized challenge of our generation. I at least want to be able to say that I tried to stop it. Don’t you? -Sonja Lane WindWorks! Northwest, www.wwnw.org

— Posted by WindWorksNW

July 22, 2009
6:28 a.m.
Both sides of the equation have compelling arguments, but we shouldn't discount visual resources as completely subjective. Federal agencies, states, even entire countries (e.g. the U.K.) have developed reliable, repeatable and scientific methods for assessing visual resource values for landscape. Professional landscape architecture techniques for conducting visual inventories should be coupled with landscapes preferences of citizen experts. We just finished a regional stakeholder workshop on wind energy and scenic impacts in Wyoming that helped address this. I encourage anyone interested, to view our short visual essay on wind energy at http://www.scenic.org/wind/ Thank you, Brad Cownover, Director of Scenic Conservation at Scenic America www.scenic.org

— Posted by cownover

July 22, 2009
10:22 a.m.
Regarding the wind turbine site in White Salmon. As a local homeowner within 2 miles of the proposed site I can tell you that there are a LOT more issues than simply the obstruction of views. Unfortunately this story doesnt cover the other issues that local homeowners are faced with. Noise, Light Flicker, Night Time strobe lights, increased traffic, devaluation of property, wildlife and environmental concerns, etc. I'm a huge advocate of green power and I understand there are always pros & cons of projects like this. I am personally willing to sacrifice to have green power. However, the White Salmon placement has an overwhelming number of negative concerns simply because they are trying to place it too close to established communities and right next to the Scenic Boundary line of the Gorge. There are thousands of acres in the Eastern gorge that are much further from established communities and well outside of the Scenic Gorge area but are still close to the electric grid. These sites are much better situated for a project of this size and they wont receive pushback -

— Posted by Mitakuoyasin


Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post.

Login or register to set up an account.

© 2009, Oregon Public Broadcasting.

Search · Inside OPB · Report Reception Problems · Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Contact Us · Pressroom · Employment · Community · Audio Streams · RSS Feeds


PBSNPRPRIBBC