Hazing Sea Lions To Protect Salmon

Since early March, the states of Oregon, Washington, and Idaho have had federal permission to kill sea lions that prey on endangered salmon in the Columbia River.

The animals congregate near the Bonneville Dam, where salmon make for easy targets.

So far, wildlife managers have euthanized 10 sea lions. But there's also an effort underway to protect the salmon through hazing their predators.

Sadie Babits went out on the Columbia River to observe these scare tactics first-hand.


Bobby Begay steers his small boat up the Columbia River. His ties to the salmon here go back generations. As a member of the Yakima Tribe, he comes out here to tribal fishing sites to catch salmon.

 Hazing Sealions
Bobby Begay stands with his young crew in the boat operated by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission. Begay patrols the Columbia River below Bonneville Dam five days a week, eight hours a day, scaring sea lions away from salmon with firecrackers.

Like his ancestors before him, he considers the salmon to be sacred food.

Bobby Begay: "It's part of our livelihood. It's part of our health and well being."

Tribal fishermen tell stories of seeing so many salmon in the Columbia River that you could walk across their backs.

Those days are gone. A series of dams on the river make it hard for fish to get from the Pacific Ocean to fresh water and back again. The salmon have fallen victim to over fishing, agricultural pollution, and habitat destruction.

Pacific salmon are now listed as endangered. And they face yet another threat on the Columbia River - sea lions.

Bobby Begay: "Sea lions have probably always been in the Columbia but not to this extent and have done damage to salmon populations like it has and all of it is due because of a manmade structure which is Bonneville Dam."

Sea lion numbers have exploded along the Pacific Coast. And more than a thousand of them travel up the Columbia River looking for food.

Some of them have figured out that if they gather at the base of Bonneville Dam, they can easily catch salmon that are trying to pass by.

 Sealion Hazing
One of Bobby Begay's crew members watches for California sea lions as the boat speeds through the waters. The Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission shoot firecrackers over the sea lions to scare them away from salmon.

Biologists estimate that every year sea lions eat as many as 4000 salmon here at the dam.

This year, the federal government gave state wildlife agencies in Oregon, Washington and Idaho, the go-ahead to kill as many as 85 sea lions.

Begay won't really talk about whether he thinks this is right. He's torn.

Bobby Begay: "Well, ah the sea lion is a spiritual animal not only to us but to coastal tribes and we respect the animal as it is but also the salmon is a scared food to us as Columbia River Indians."

So Begay works to protect the salmon without killing the sea lions. He works for the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission. That's why he's out here in this boat. He patrols the river most days using fireworks to scare sea lions away from the salmon.

Boat crew: "There he is 1 o'clock! 50 yards!"

Begay's crew shoots firecrackers over the sea lion.

Bobby Begay: "And hopefully we'll get them into the main stem of the river and start hazing them down stream."

Robin Brown: "The hazing really is not highly effective. The animals are really quick to learn."

Robin Brown is a marine mammal researcher for the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.

It's his agency that makes the call on whether to euthanize a sea lion. He says  that step comes only after all else has failed. 

Robin Brown: "We have to have observed them killing salmon and steelhead and they have to have been exposed to all the non lethal methods of harassment that you've observed here today and shown that that isn't detouring them from being here and feeding."

The Humane Society opposes killing the sea lions. It continues to ask the courts to put a stop to it in the future.

While this legal battle plays out, Bobby Begay will keep hazing the sea lions in the coming years. But for now it's getting to be the time of year when the sea lions start heading back down the Columbia River to the Pacific Coast to breed.


Online:

To learn more about the problem between sea lions and salmon visit the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission

Visit the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife to read daily updates on trapping sea lions

To watch and count salmon coming to the fish ladders at Bonneville Dam visit the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers site

Comments

May 20, 2009
9:18 p.m.
Congratulations to OPB for repeating the same factual errors that have been rampant in the media. Sea lions have not "exploded" on the Columbia. They are merely returning here after a long absence -- after being exterminated for years by fishermen. Their presence in the area below Bonneville dam is a natural part of our ecosystem. The dam itself is not, however the sea lions are not posing an unnatural threat to salmon even when hunting below the dam. The reason? Before there was a dam, there was Celilo falls. The sea lions congregated there, along with seals and other predators, and hunted for salmon. It's part of the evolutionary history of this region, and is one reason why salmon have evolved a run strategy -- as a means to "swamp" predators, so that there are enough to feed the ecosystem and also enough to get through to spawn and replenish the species. Salmon have evolved to live with sea lions. What they have not been able to deal with are gill nets on the river, drift nets in the oceans, and DAMS that change their entire habitat and then chew up their young as they are trying to get downstream. Any credible researcher knows this. No credible researcher worth his or her degree would even suggest that sea lions or other natural predators are the problem here. But politically, it's so much easier to scapegoat and kill unarmed animals than to go against the fishing industry or the Bonneville Power Administration. So sea lions die while salmon recovery takes a back seat, once again, to self interests. I'm sad to see OPB repeating these same errors and failing to dig into the facts. If nothing else, it is heartening to hear that, at the very least, Bobby Begay seems to find the idea of killing these animals for no reason distasteful. As do we all. Shame on the ODFW for churning out misinformation about the real causes of the salmon decline, and shame on them for killing sea lions instead of actually addressing salmon recovery.

— Posted by OregonNative

May 20, 2009
9:44 p.m.
Your story implies that there's something new about sea lions on the river, and more seriously, it implies that sea lions are the reason the salmon have all disappeared. Surely you must know that even the ODFW knows, deep down inside, that the sea lions have nothing to do with this issue. They and the salmon are natural partners in the wheel of life on the Columbia. Your fact checkers might find this interesting. Way back in 1997, Oregon State University conducted a study in which they found that, although researchers did not consider sea lions to be a serious threat to the salmon, that the public (especially the fishing public) erroneously believed that control of natural predators was important for salmon recovery. Here is a direct quote from this study: "While most professionals would argue that reducing predators like seals and sea lions, increasing hatchery production, and eliminating ocean driftnets fall decidedly on the less important end of the scale, the public thinks that reducing marine mammals and stopping ocean driftnetting are very important." Here is a link where you can still find the survey itself: http://oregonstate.edu/dept/ncs/newsarch/1997/April97/salmonsurvey.htm. So, basically, while researchers have known for more than a decade that killing natural predators was not a serious answer to salmon decline, the States have nevertheless chosen to pander to public ignorance rather than to make tough decisions that would really help to bring the salmon back. This is what we call putting politics ahead of reason. It's wrong all the way around. This approach will not help the salmon, it will not help the public to become better informed about the ecosystem they are a part of, and it will certainly not help the sea lions who are only just beginning to recover in numbers since the passage of the MMPA in 1972. Please, OPB. Get this right.

— Posted by JeffN

May 20, 2009
10:14 p.m.
I notice that you have linked to the CRITFC, the ODFW, and the Army Corps of Engineers. How interesting that all three of these are agencies that, for political reasons, support the killing of sea lions. The CRITFC lobbies for the tribal fishing industry, the ODFW earns its budget through selling fishing licenses to the people who are actually causing the salmon crisis, and the Army Corps of Engineers built the network of dams that have desecrated the salmon habitat. So naturally, they're all for killing sea lions in order to remove scrutiny from their own roles in salmon decline. For a more balanced perspective, please see: http://sealiondefensebrigade.org/. Killing sea lions is a very sad chapter in a disastrous record of mis-management and crimes against nature perpetrated by wildlife management agencies in the Pacific NW. Any time we believe the "answer" to extinction of one species lies in the extermination of another species, we can be sure that we are on the wrong path. For numerous examples of bad management practices involving a pattern of killing off natural predators, only to discover unintended consequences and ecological disaster, please see http://www.predatordefense.org/. Killing sea lions simply makes no sense. It will do nothing for salmon recovery, and will cost innocent lives. The sea lions, the salmon, and the public all deserve better.

— Posted by SeaLionDefenseBrigade

May 21, 2009
11:26 a.m.
This article states that sea lions "killed" 4000 salmon. How many did fishermen kill in the same time period? Of course when fishermen catch salmon, it is not referred to as killing or predation. Why the difference in terminology? I would say that there is even more reason to name it killing by humans, as humans have a choice in what they eat, especially sport fishermen, whereas sea lions, acting from instinct alone, do not.. The sea lions have just now begun to recover from their decimation by predator humans. If we could learn to live sustainably off the land and water by diminishing or eliminating the use of pesticides on crops, reducing energy use, and reducing commercial and sport fishing, perhaps we could actually solve this problem. I am glad at least that Bobby chooses to haze the sea lions instead of killing them and respects them as having rights too.

— Posted by ecofriendly

May 21, 2009
3:04 p.m.
I keep hearing these erroneous arguments regarding the number of sea lions that "should" be on the Columbia. For thousands of years, there was a balance between sea lions and salmon on the river. The numbers for both species were much larger than what we see now, and the ecosystem operated on a healthy level. The species that threw the whole works into chaos, admit it, has been the human being. We are greedy and wasteful creatures and we need to take responsibility for our mistakes. Killing sea lions is simply another huge mistake that we cannot tolerate. Stop the killing. Stop spreading rumors that have no basis in fact.

— Posted by dapplehound

May 21, 2009
3:13 p.m.
Fact Check: Yes, last year sea lions were seen eating 4000 salmon. That number is observed predation at the dam. Ignoring the fact that predation occurs outside of the observation areas and below the surface of the Columbia ignores the bigger picture-4000 is a small glimpse, small percentage, of a much larger predation problem. Thanks Sadie for keeping this issue in the front of people's minds. The lethal removal of these animals has become an unfortunate reality. Yes, sea lions have always been around but not at this level. The balance between sea lion and salmon has shifted and if you want to recover salmon-sea lions are another factor that has to be managed for.

— Posted by cm521

May 22, 2009
8:15 a.m.
It is incorrect to say that sea lions have not been around "at this level," unless what you mean is that there used to be many more of them -- which is true. There were seals and sea lions all over the river. Lewis and Clark actually named both rocks and streams after them, in the area near where Bonneville dam is now. They congregated beneath Celilo falls. Please get your facts straight and stop spreading hysteria over sea lions. Take responsibility. It has been our own species that was never preying on salmon "at this level" on the Columbia. We're the ones that screwed up the works. YOu can trace it exactly: Salmon and sea lions and many other predators did just fine on the Columbia river for tens of thousands of years until just about the mid 1800s. Coincidentally, that was when the fishing industry arrived here. And the last straw happened around the 1930s, when the dams went in. You can directly trace that trajectory - I don't know why anyone would try to argue otherwise, when it's so verifiable. cm521 claims that "the balance between sea lion and salmon has shifted" - no, it is the balance of the whole ecosystem being thrown off by our own species. Look it up. I urge you. Again, sea lions far outnumbered the ones in the river right now. It was healthy for the ecosystem. Stop trying to "balance" things by further harming the wildlife around us. Instead, put things back into balance by removing the gluttonous fishing. Get the gill nets OUT of the river. Get the anglers out of the river until the salmon can recover. It is only common sense. COMMON SENSE. Why is that so rare in this discussion?

— Posted by OregonNative


Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post.

Login or register to set up an account.

© 2009, Oregon Public Broadcasting.

Search · Inside OPB · Report Reception Problems · Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Contact Us · Pressroom · Employment · Community · Audio Streams · RSS Feeds


PBSNPRPRIBBC